![]() |
|
||||
|
|
|||||
Dealing With People Who Have a Handicap-- by Wm. J. Diehm![]()
When the fever abated I was sent to Children's Orthopedic Hospital in Spokane, Washington. For 7 years, off and on, I had treatment at this place. The hospital was a dumping ground for all types of crippled children: mentally retarded, including Down's synmentally ill, including those with childhood schizophrenia and autism; emotionally disturbed, including those who were hyperactive and suffering from psychological trauma; brain damaged; and all forms of physical deformity. The only ones they didn't accept were those who had a contagious disease. When I was 13 years old I got out of the hospital and went to high school as a freshman in Pasco, Washington. I wore braces on both legs and was moderately impaired in both arms. I have lived my life in a paraplegic condition, and now have additional limitations due to a postpolio condition. I earned my Ph.D. from U.C.L.A., specializing in Special Education and Psychology. I could be considered an expert in the field of people with a handicap--both from education and personal experience. My suggestions for coping with these people have grown out of my own involvement, my education, my religion, and my knowledge of life.
Don't use demeaning terminology in dealing with those who have a handicap. I object to defining a person by their disability. Words like "cripple," derived from the Old English "to creep," will perpetuate false ideas. The same is true of "invalid," which means "not valid," or obvious ugly words like "abnormal" or "deformed." Some other words like disabled, lame, limping, gimpy, disabled, or even special bring to mind stereotyped images and often make people who have a disability seem less than human. Such words play upon pity and stimulate illusions of inadequacy. I have heard people say: he is schizophrenic, he is mentally ill, he is sociopathic, or he is a cripple. Would we say he is measles, he is mumps, or he is chicken pox? We don't define people by their diseases; neither is it right to define people by their handicaps. A person may "have" a handicap but that doesn't make him a handicap. "He is handicapped" defines a person by his disability; while saying "He has a handicap" allows him to be more than "crippled." Some people are sensitive about their handicap; others do not mind being called "crippled." Some people are so sensitive that they back away from the current labels with one euphemism after another. One man said to me, "I am not handicapped, I am handicapable." Another person said, "Everyone has some handicap; mine is physical and a little more evident." Most people with a handicap have some level of sensitivity about it, particularly when the handicap becomes the center of attention and other obvious virtues are ignored. I am opting for saying, "He or she has a handicap" (whenever possible) rather than "He or she is handicapped." I know it is a little thing and that I don't do it myself, but it is a step in the right direction. Don't label people by their deficiencies. However, calling people demeaning names is a matter of the attitude and the heart rather than verbiage. One person can say "crippled" with a sincere attitude that would not bring offense; and another person can correctly address "that person with a handicap" and make you feel like a worm.
Do not help people with a handicap in a deferential manner. An example of the difference between being deferential and helpful can be found in war when soldiers give special care as they bandage their own wounded--care that the enemy doesn't receive. Or, when we bury the enemy, it is often a common grave without the special services we give our own. That difference is called "empathy." Don't treat a person with a handicap as any less valuable than a person without one. The "I am glad to do it" attitude will set well; but the "why are you in my way" posture can cause offense.
Treat people with a handicap in a normal way. One time I was horrified by a man who had no legs, no arms, and was blind. Then I heard him read by passing his lips over raised Braille words. That man did more to change my attitude than any well person. When you meet a handicapped person you can be grateful you don't have to bear that burden--not a gratitude that makes you condescending or aloof, but one that brings you to a realization that some people are called upon to bear burdens that we wouldn't want.
Let people with a handicap do things for themselves. The quickest way to make a handicap worse is to be pushed around in a wheelchair and waited on hand and foot. Usually a person needs the exercise of pushing himself and the stretch of reaching for things. Do not take away the independence of people with a handicap. If it is at all possible, let them do it themselves.
Don't lecture people with a handicap on how they ought to be unless you really know how they are. Softly and gently I need to warn zealous, dedicated people that not everyone who has a crippling condition can be healed by their prayers. I could write a book on the subject, but sufficient for the time being are these words: "Don't throw someone else into the deep water, unless you are walking on it." Put your evaluation priorities on something higher than a physical disability.
![]()
| Coping Index | Old age | Senior Citizens | The Sick | Sick & Dying | | Profoundly Injured | Chronic illness | Seniors-Site Homepage | Site Master | E-mail | Sponsor/Advertising Information Last update 7/26/96 |
|
|
||
|
|
| © 1996-2005 Seniors Site | Terms Of Use |