First Amendment Rights vs Drug War

On May 10, 1990, a Federal Grand Jury indicted Robert Lawrence Boyll, a non-Native American member of the Native American Church, for:

  1. unlawfully importing peyote through the United States mail and,
  2. possessing peyote with the intent to distribute it.
Mr. Boyll went on a pilgrimage to Mexico to obtain peyote for himself and members of the congregations with whom he worships. In September of 1991 Judge Juan Burciaga, Chief Federal Judge of the District of New Mexico (Albuquerque) granted Defendant Robert Boyll's motions to dimiss the inditment. The Plaintiff, "United States of America" appealed the decision in the 10th Federal District Court in Denver where the Burciaga decision was upheld by a panel of three judges. All four judges involved were required to read Dr. Omar Stewart's book "The Peyote Religion" (1987 University of Oklahoma Press) which became Exhibit A. The first few inspiring paragraphs of the decision follow below. The entire 10 page decision can be located at: ftp://ftp.cit.cornell.edu/pub/special/NativeProfs/law/boyll.txt.. It is well worth reading even without a legal background. Judge Burciaga died suddenly two years ago in March, but not before he left a great legacy of truth.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

"THERE is a genius to our Constitution. Its genius is that it speaks to the freedoms of the individual. It is this genius that brings the present matter before the Court. More specifically, this matter concerns a freedom that was a natural idea whose genesis was in the Plymouth Charter, and finds its present form in the First mendment to the United States Constitution -- the freedom of religion.

The Government's "war on drugs" has become a wildfire that threatens to consume those fundamental rights of the individual deliberately enshrined in our Constitution. Ironically, as we celebrate the 200th anniversary of the Bill of Rights, the tattered Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures and the now frail Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination or deprivation of liberty without due process have fallen as casualties in this "war on drugs." It was naive of this Court to hope that this erosion of constitiutional protections would stop at the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. But today, the "war" targets one of the most deeply held fundamental rights -- the First Amendment right to freely exercise one's religion.

To us in the Southwest, this freedom of religion has singular significance because it affects diverse cultures. It is as much of us as the rain on our hair, the wind on the grass, and the sun on our faces. It is so naturally a part of us that when the joy of this beautiful freedom sings in our souls, we find it hard to conceive that it could ever be imperilled.

Yet, today, in this land of bright blue skies and yellow grass, of dusty prairies and beautiful mesas, and vistas of red earth with walls of weathered rock, eroded by oceans of time, the free spirit of the individual once again is threatened by the arrogance of Government.

The issue presented is the recurring conflict between the Native American Church members' right to freely exercise their religion through the ceremonial use of peyote and the Government's efforts to eradicate illegal drugs. To the Government, peyote is a angerous hallucinogen. To Robert Boyll, peyote is both a sacrament and a deity essential to his religion. But this matter concerns competing interests far greater than those relating to this small, spineless cactus having psychedelic properties. It draws forth a troublesome constitutional conflict which arises from fundamentally different perspectives of peyote.

In its "war" to free our society of the devastating effects of drugs, the Government slights its duty to observe the fundamental freedom of individuals to practice the religion of their choice, regardless of race. Simply put, the Court is faced with the quintessential constitutional conflict between an inalienable right upon which this country was founded and the response by the Government to the swelling political passions of the day. In this fray, the Court is compelled to halt this menacing attack on our constitutional freedoms."

Signed: Judge Juan Burciaga, Chief Federal Judge of the District of New Mexico

The above was found on the Internet by the webmaster.


If you would like to post comments or one of your own opinions please click send us an e-mail.

| Senior Citizens' Opinion Forum | Speakout Forum | Gov't Waste Forum |
| Seniors-Site Homepage | E-Mail | Site Master |

Last change 5/30/96